Future vs. Gorgeous Doll: The Plot Thickens – TikTok Shadowbans and Five-Year Secrets!

Future and Gorgeous Doll: A Messy Love Triangle?

Remember Gorgeous Doll? The Instagram model who accused Latto of assault? Well, she's back in the headlines, and this time, it's with none other than rapper Future.

In a now-viral audio clip, Gorgeous Doll appears to be on the phone with Future, who repeatedly denies knowing her. "I don't know you, bruh. I don't even know you," Future says in the recording.

Gorgeous Doll is claiming they had a five-year relationship and that Future is trying to silence her with legal threats. She's also hinting at taking him to court and potentially exposing him for using her for inspiration in his music.

This Gorgeous Doll and Future saga is turning into a full-blown soap opera! 

In one of her latest posts, she claims that Future is actively trying to silence her, and get this – she says he's reporting her TikTok posts! Yeah, you heard that right. Apparently, every time she tries to drop some truth bombs on TikTok, her posts mysteriously vanish or get flagged. She's convinced it's Future's team trying to shut her down. "He's trying to control the narrative," she said in a recent live stream. "But I won't be silenced."

And get this, she's not just talking about a fling. She's insisting they had a full-blown five-year relationship! Five years, people! That's a serious chunk of time. She's hinting at receipts, too, saying she has messages, photos, and even videos to back up her claims.

But here's where it gets even juicier: Gorgeous Doll is alleging that Future used details of their relationship as inspiration for his music, without giving her any credit. She's talking about taking legal action, not just for the alleged harassment, but also for intellectual property theft. Can you imagine the courtroom drama?

She is also claiming that she has been threatened by people working for Future, and that she is afraid for her safety. She claims that the "I don't know you" phone call was an attempt to discredit her, and that she will continue to tell her story. Writing a book was also teased by the former stripper turned content creator.

The internet is buzzing, of course. Some are calling her a clout chaser, while others are convinced she's telling the truth. One thing's for sure, this story has legs, and Gorgeous Doll is making it clear she's not going anywhere.

For me, something is missing from this story. Why is Gorgeous Doll so angry after 5 years? 

What does she want from future?

Tell me what you all think?  

Is Gorgeous Doll telling the truth? Is this just another publicity stunt or a desperate attempt for fame? 

Drop your thoughts in the comments!

 

Usher and Tameka: Saga Continues...

Tameka and Usher... At It Again!  

Just less that 2 weeks after Tameka Foster; Usher's estranged wife buried her son, Kile Glover, Tameka is expressing Usher's careless attitude displayed during the ordeal.

If you remember before the tragic accident that eventually took the life of little Kile; Usher and Tameka were going through a bitter custody battle over Usher's two sons. Due to the event Usher requested to have the hearing delayed, Tameka called his request a "transparent sham" and believes Usher was seeking to delay the hearing because he believes the judge will rule in favor of a grieving mother. 

According to reports Tameka claimed in recent court documents that during the 15 days Kile was on life support "Usher visited Kile in the hospital only once,” that contradicts the reports that he (Usher) kept vigil with Tameka during Kyle's hospitalization. 
She also says she requested that Usher send a tweet to his fans to solicit prayers for Kile, but that he sent a Twitpic of his breakfast instead. Tameka says Usher is only pretending to care for her deceased son and any actions otherwise are to impress the media.

The judge denied the postponement and the trial will resume on August 13th and wrap up soon after.

Wow! Can we all just get along? 
I do not wish to be the judge in this case, but I do hope that the ruling is based on facts and what's best for the kids involved. Will continue to up-to-date.